如何快速的提升GRE的写作能力

如何快速的提升GRE的写作能力，快来一起学习吧，分享下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

如何快速的提升GRE的写作能力

逻辑思维能力是GRE写作考察的重点，清晰的文章结构框架，合理严密的论述，都能看出考生的逻辑思维能力。所以，真正写的时候，先把第一段和最后一段都写了，然后每段写个第一句，列出框架。最好能在第一段把你要写的内容都先简要概括一下。最后自己再总结一下这个框架的逻辑结构，看看有没有什么问题。这样可以让自己的作文体现出较为清晰的结构框架，展现你的逻辑思维能力。

关于ISSUE，方法也差不多，需要注意写提纲时的仔细性，建议大家把对问题的观点和引用的例子都写出来，准备好写作提纲。写的例子要放在提纲里，ISSUE跟A也一样，写完一遍提纲，自己重新看，到最后就是训练自己看到一个题，在2分钟以内迅速组织出一个比较详细的提纲。这样ISSUE的准备也就差不多了。

GRE写作备考经验：熟能生巧

练习的最终目的是为了形成惯性思维，条件反射。因为实际考试的时间真的是非常紧张。要想克服心理压力，现场思考每句话的条理性绝非易事。特别是下笔的时候十指纷飞，远远超过大脑的运转速度。这种时候只有思维上做好充分准备的人，才能驾轻就熟，运用自如。

题目中提到politics，大脑中就应当出现Franklin Roosevelt， Lincoln， Gerhard Shroeder， Gandhi……; 提到ART，脑海中就应该条件反射的立刻想到Rembrandt， Van Gogh， Starry night， night watch， Henmingway， the old man and the sea等内容。提到Scandal，就该想到Nixon，watergate，bill clinton，sex sandal，Enran等内容。总之，熟练很重要，熟能生巧才是王道。

GRE写作备考经验：自我修改

练习作文不能写过就算，经常性的回顾并修改一下自己以前写过的文章，可以帮助自己发现以前没注意到的各种漏洞和不足。埋头狂写，只能导致lose the stake! 在认真学习一段时间的写作后，再回头修改自己最初的作文，肯定会发现很多的毛病，在巩固学习的同时也能够看到自己的进步，建立起足够的自信和心理优势!

GRE写作备考经验：模仿别人的优秀文章

他山之玉，可以攻石。模仿是最好的快速提升进步的学习方法。从别人的文章中了解写作思路，学习写作技巧，发现一些精彩的好词好句，对于提高自身水平会有很大帮助。

模仿需要注意以下几点

1.要有可以模仿的文章(最好是带有说理性的文章)

2.要理解这篇文章，理解它的用词、句子结构、段落结构

3.这些文章最好具备正确的中文翻译和适当的文章长度

具体做法：

首先分析文章，分析每一句和上一句的关系。美国人写作文的一个特点是，通常每段的第一句就包含整段文字的内容，也就是我们常说的topic　sentence。另一个特点是当你写完一个句子后，你要多问为什么。提出一个问题，然后给出一个圆满的回答，这就是一篇优秀的作文。

GRE写作官方题库高频ARGUMENT题目满分范文分享：attempt to improve highway safety

GRE作文官方题库ARGUMENT题目：

In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patrol, many drivers are exceeding the speed limit. Prunty County should instead undertake the same kind of road improvement project that Butler County completed five years ago: increasing lane widths, resurfacing rough highways, and improving visibility at dangerous intersections. Today, major Butler County roads still have a 55 mph speed limit, yet there were 25 percent fewer reported accidents in Butler County this past year than there were five years ago.

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

【满分范文赏析】

This author argues that a recent reduction in Prunty County's speed limit on its major roads (55 to 45 miles per hour miles per hour) has proven ineffective and that the county should rescind the speed limit change. Instead, urges the author, the city should focus on infrastructure improvement, much like Butler County, wherein drivers experienced a 25% reduction in accidents while enjoying speeds of up to 55 miles per hour. After a review of the assumptions therein, the integrity of the argument comes into question.

【本段结构】

本文采用了标准的Argument开头段结构，即C—A—F的开头结构。本段首先概括原文的Conclusion，之后简要提及原文为支持其结论所引用的一系列Assumption及细节，最后给出开头段到正文段的过渡句，指出原文的Flaw，即这些Assumption无法让原文逻辑上没有问题。

【本段功能】

作为Argument开头段，本段具体功能就在于发起攻击并概括原文的结论，即Prunty地区应当采取和Butler地区相同的道路设施改善计划。本段接下来提到了原文中为支持之前的Conclusion所提供的证据，即在Prunty地区采取的限速政策没效果，以及在Butler地区采取的道路设施改善计划减少了事故。文章提及这些信息，为是在正文段中对这些Assumption即将进行的具体攻击做铺垫。

Firstly, only recently has the speed limit in Pruntly County been reduced and only for major roads. Perhaps not enough time has passed to determine the change’s effectiveness. Further, no indication of results from a study on the roadways with a speed limit change has been provided. Lacking such a link between the conclusions that Prunty's road safety effort initiative has failed is invalidated.

【本段结构】

本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即先是提及原文的第一个逻辑错误，之后分析该逻辑错误的原因，接下来，进一步分析这样的错误为什么让原文的Conclusion不成立。

【本段功能】

作为正文第一段，本段攻击原文所犯的第一个重要逻辑错误——样本类错误。原文提到在采取限制速度一年后，Pruntly地区的事故发生率没有下降。但是，这些样本并不一定有说服力，毕竟，短短的一年时间并不能让人们看到这个限速政策的实际效果。所以，原文当中的这个观点是站不住脚的。

Secondly, the argument assumes that all other factors affecting highway accident rates have remained unchanged since the county lowered its speed limit. However, the author fails to provide evidence to support this assumption. It is entirely possible that the lower speed limit does in fact serve to reduce the accident rate, while some other factor, such as unseasonably poor weather, reduced law enforcement measures, or even an influx of teenage drivers to the area, has served to increase the accident rate. Without considering and ruling out these and other factors that might have served to increase the accident rate since the speed limit was lowered, the author cannot justifiably conclude that this safety effort has failed.

【本段结构】

本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即先是提及原文的第二个逻辑错误，之后分析该逻辑错误的原因，接下来，进一步分析这样的错误为什么让原文的Conclusion不成立。

【本段功能】

作为正文第二段，本段攻击原文所犯的第二个重要逻辑错误——因果类错误。原文提到在采取限制速度后，Pruntly地区的事故发生率没有下降。但是，原文忽视了可能造成事故的其它因素。而相比之下，限速政策实际上有助于避免交通事故的发生。在没有考虑到这些相关因素的情况下，原文并不能证明这个观点是合理的。

Thirdly, in the argument, the author implies that the higher speed limit in Butler County has not served to increase the incidence of road accidents in that county. It is entirely possible that the 55-mph speed limit actually serves to increase the accident rate on Butler's highways, but that others factors, such as stricter law enforcement measures or improved driver education, have served to decrease the accident rate to a greater extent. Without considering and ruling out these and other factors which might have served to decrease the accident rate in Butler County, the author cannot confidently recommend that Prunty County emulate Butler County’s approach to the problem.

【本段结构】

本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即先是提及原文的第三个逻辑错误，之后分析该逻辑错误的原因，接下来，进一步分析这样的错误为什么让原文的Conclusion不成立。

【本段功能】

作为正文第三段，本段攻击原文所犯的第三个重要逻辑错误——因果类错误。原文提到在Butler地区没有采取限速政策并不会给当地的交通事故带来负面的影响。但事实上，这样的因果关系可能被颠倒了。相比之下，如果采取了限速，Butler地区可能会更安全。在没有考虑到这些相关因素的情况下，原文当中的这个观点是不合逻辑的。

In conclusion, to strengthen the argument, the author must better assess the impact of the new speed limit on road safety, with more statistical information about the accident rate on Prunty's major roads, collected over a longer time period. Additionally, the author must account for all other factors that might influence the accident rate on roads in both counties

【本段结构】

本段采用的Argument结尾段结构是单纯的Suggestion结构。即本段给出了可以增强原文说服力的合理建议Suggestion，包括原文作者需要进一步提供的证据和信息等。

【本段功能】

本段作为Argument结尾段，具体功能为对原文当中的逻辑问题提出建议。段落给出合理的建议包括：作者必须通过更多的统计信息，更好地评估限速政策和道路安全的关系，而且这些信息是在长期观察下得来的结果;此外，作者必须考虑到能对交通事故产生影响的其它相关因素。不难发现，结尾段总结提出的建议与正文各段中依次攻击的错误遥相呼应，即分别对应了样本类错误和因果类错误，这使全篇文章显得浑然一体。

GRE写作范文：忠诚

GRE写作题目：

Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyalty-whether to one‘s friends， to one’s school or place of employment， or to any institution-is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force.

大多数人被告知忠诚是一种美德。但是无论是对朋友、对学校、对单位还是对任何机构，忠诚时常都是弊大于利的。

GRE写作范文：

I disagree with the author for he has confused the faithfulness with the misguided or overextended loyalty. In fact， loyalty does be a cherished virtue that should be given enough emphasis.

Loyalty， a kind of lasting persistence and its precondition is that the subject of fidelity is worthy of such strong emotion. In each society， loyalty is a indispensable and vital part of the system of morality. No matter in schools， at home or at work， first midst and last， people accept a similar education that as an individual， he or she should first have a sense of ligeance， that is work for the whole. Of course， the subjects of loyalty are various including scientific theory， friends， family， schools， places of employment and the nation. A vivid example can lend support to the statement is the heroical astronomer - Bronow， who advanced Copernicus‘ theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun， enraged the Roma church that held the Ptolemaic system of astronomy and was burnt to death just because he refused to give up his scientific theory. It is the lasting loyalty toward truth that lead Bronow to sacrifice himself. And people all respect such duteous spirit. However， without loyalty， the morality of a society will deteriorate into apathy desert and everyone just lives for him /herself， that is to say， no one is willing to pay loyalty to the whole， then finally the human civilization will fall apart.

However， on the other hand， the fidelity should not be confused with misguided or overextended loyalty and the latter is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force. People all hold that mutual loyalty between friends is the basis of lasting friendship. But people should also realize that true loyalty and authentic responsibility for a friend are not only always believing him or her unconditionally but also persuading， helping and even impeaching him or her when him or her has committed serious mistakes or even crimes. Of course， when facing up to such painful dilemma， each one will hesitate because he or she is afraid of being censured to betray his or her friend and some one may choose to keep slient in order to insist of the so-called loyalty.

In fact， such behavior may prevent his or her friend from taking right actions. The same to a school， a family， a company even the nation， when the subject that people once string along with no longer deserves loyalty， people should resolutely choose to be loyal to the truth， the justice and the humanity. That calls for people are always alert to what they think right and what they think wrong， via doing so， people can change their mind for right choice on time.

To sum up， people should insist on true loyalty， and always avoid being the victim of the misguided or overextended loyalty. In the world， there is nothing that can be always absolutely right or wrong and changing happens all the time. So people should always hold deep insight to discern what deserves their loyalty and what does not.

如何快速的提升GRE的写作能力相关文章：