GRE作文之写作原则不能丢

GRE作文之写作原则不能丢?快来一起看看吧，分享下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE作文之写作原则不能丢

原则一：观点上要有原创性

观点是GRE作文考试的核心内容，考察考生能否对一个观点进行深入分析与思考并最终提出一个有层次的观点。有了原创观点就不用担心雷同。而如果真的要借鉴范文观点，建议大家应该尽可能做一些调整，以避免雷同，也可以干脆在文中讲明这个思路是借鉴了哪一本参考书的。美国人对真小人比对伪君子要宽容。

原则二：提升写作备考时间利用率

这个核心原则不仅是对GRE考试而言，实际上适用于所有考试：在最短的时间内获得最多的分数。听上去简单明了，但做起来就就不是那么容易了，基本思路是既不做没有效率的事情，也不做比较有效率的事情，而只做最有效率的事情。对于GRE考试来说，要做到这一点就一定要学会选择，即选择最有效率的事情来做。

原则三：高分写作有套路

首先大家一定要搞清楚一个概念：英语作文水平和GRE作文高分之间并不存在必然直接的联系，作文水平高的人很可能得不到高分，但是作文水平明明很低的人却能一鸣惊人。这是因为考官不会看你以前的习作，也不会看你平时的水平，他只看你在考场上写出来的文章。

所以哪怕考生的文采斐然，每每创新，平时练习时屡出佳文，对于考试也不会有太大帮助。想要在GRE作文中拿到高分，考生要做的是把一个套路，一种思路，自己写得好的话语不断的重复熟练，做到在考试中能够收发自如，信手拈来，这样自然就能拿到高分。

GRE写作想要拿到高分，遵循上述原则能帮助大家少走不少弯路，再结合自己平时的复习练熟写作技巧并准备好足够的材料，相信大家都能在考试中取得满意的成绩。

新GRE写作范文：竞争利弊问题

题目：

"Competition is ultimately more beneficial than detrimental to society."

归根结底，竞争对于社会是利多弊少。

正文：

Darwin suggested that the process of evolution is one based on competition. This deadly competition weeds out the weak and only the fittest of the species survives. Humans, being the product of millions of years of evolution, are by nature, competitive beings. Yet, humans are also social beings. Like the bees in the hive, we are not very successful living completely on our own. We need to cooperate with other individuals for our survival. Thus, a conflict ensues, between our innate competitiveness, and our need to cooperate. There are pros and cons associated with both. However, it is my belief that overall, competition, is more detrimental than beneficial to human society.

First, let us try to identify why there is competition in the first place. In an environment abundant with resources, where supply outstrips demand, there is very little need for the inhabitants to fight with each other over them. This is not the case on planet earth. Resources are limited, and there is constant jostling to get to the front of the queue to get acquire them. For example, thousands of prospective students apply to gain entrance to top universities around the world, but there are only a handful of places in those universities. Thus, there is competition to get into to these hallowed institutions of higher learning.From a utilitarian perspective, competition is a good thing. In evolution it is responsible for the elimination of "weak" genes. In the business environment, it gets rid of the weaker players. In politics, it weeds out unpopular candidates. In academia, it gets rid of weak students.

Furthermore, competition leads to self improvement. Businesses will strive to offer better products and services at lesser prices. The consumer reaps rich rewards from this competitive spirit. Politicians strive to do the utmost for the people, so they would get reelected. Students excel in there studies, trying to outdo each other.

Thus, ostensibly, competition is responsible for the betterment of the society as a whole. However, this is just the superficial view. Underneath the surface, competition, in every aspect, is slowly eating away at the very fabric of the society.

While it is true to say that competition in corporate world has brought great benefits to the consumer, the society as "Missed A here"whole is playing a great price for it. Most businesses are exploiting cheap labour in the third world to maximise their profits. There are thousands of sweatshops run by well known western corporations in countries like Indonesia, Bangladesh and China. People are forced to work in squalid conditions, often 16 hours a day. They are lucky to receive a dollar a day for there labours. The moment a government in any of these countries try to improve the working conditions of the employees, these multinational giants flee the country, often leaving whole communities facing financial ruin. The corporations are aware that there are plenty of other labour markets that could be exploited with gay abandon.

That is just the human cost. What about the environmental costs? Competition has forced many corporations to "stream line" their operations. Environmental standards are normally the first victims of this "stream line" process. A significant amount of environmental pollution and land degradation has been blamed on industry, yet the factories keep producing more and more. Thousands of items go unsold each year due to competition. Only a fraction of this merchandise is recycled. The rest goes to the already overflowing landfills.

In politics, the detrimental effects of competition are blatant. Politicians often resort to popular yet socially damaging policies to gain votes. These measures include imprudent spending to rabble rousing. The current volatility in Israel and Palestine, the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka, and the famine in Zimbabwe are all, at least partially, problems created by politicians to get elected.

It has been said that education is one sphere where competition has always had a beneficial influence. Even this claim is dubious. Due to competition students are less likely to exchange ideas with one another, thus enriching the student population as whole. Furthermore, competition drives students to study well to pass exams, but not to gain wisdom. Students spend many hours preparing for standardised tests; tests which many believe are inherently flawed. Thus, it is often not the most intellectual student who succeeds, but the most competitive.

Competition is an inborn human trait. It has some positive qualities, but overall, it does far more harm than help to the society. As intelligent beings, humans can transcend their evolutionary weaknesses. Thus, humans should rely less competition and more cooperation for the sake of the society.

新版GRE写作新题库：Argument

题目：

The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc.

"A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks are strong enough to last for two years. We have always advertised our use of the Endure process, but the new study shows that despite our socks' durability, our average customer actually purchases new Dura-Socks every three months. Furthermore, our customers surveyed in our largest market, northeastern United States cities, say that they most value Dura-Socks' stylish appearance and availability in many colors. These findings suggest that we can increase our profits by discontinuing use of the Endure manufacturing process."

Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

中文翻译：

最近一次对于Dura-Sock使用者的调查表明我们公司用于其专利生产方式"Endure"上的钱是浪费的，这种方式使我们生产的袜子足以使用两年。 Dura-Sock一直在做广告宣传它使用"Endure"方式，但这次新调查显示尽管我们的袜子十分耐穿，但Dura-Sock的消费者每三个月就买一双Dura-Sock袜子。而且，在位于美国北部城市我们最大的商场回应调查的Dura-Sock消费者说他们最欣赏Dura-Sock时尚的外观和众多颜色的选择。这些事实说明Dura-Sock可以通过停止使用"Endure"生产方式来增加盈利。

写一篇回应，在其中检视文章的论证中述及和/或未明确述及的假设，务请解释文章的论证是如何依赖于这些假设的，并指出如果这些假设不成立会对文章的论证带来何种影响。

GRE作文之写作原则不能丢相关文章：

1.托福综合写作和独立写作异同